HORTRAME IPS Alignment — Full Interactive Map v0.4.0

Realized output under audit

0.0simulation time

—output event

—event alignment

—trace 0–100

v1frozen lens version

—source → recipients

Waiting for an enacted output.

Five-Vow field / alignment thermometer

Point position shows the dominant direction of tension; color shows severity. Severe equal tension can remain near the center but stay red. The pentagon evaluates an event; it does not prove control of the actor.

Output history

Inject a discrete event

source IPS

channel

event label

intensity0.65

recipient fan-out3

descendant chance0.62

One enacted output may broadcast to several recipients. Its alignment audit is one event-level verdict. Each recipient can transform the shared input differently and later emit a different output.

Continuous + discrete flow

Fine particles are continuous background flows. Large pulses are discrete output events. Discrete arrival can change local state, routing, salience, or topology; descendants then re-enter the network as new inputs.

Event log

Open membership / exact history-dependence sandbox

This panel implements the narrow two-incumbent example around Theorem 4.1 / Corollary 4.2 from Priority-State Dynamics v07. It is an exact linear probability-state submodel, not a claim that the whole IPS network obeys these equations.

newcomer stay1 update

newcomer q₁0.25

Exact structural lesson: returning to the original membership does not generally return the original endpoint. A transient participant can leave persistent state/history behind. The restoration formula is valid only under the theorem's stated stochastic-priority assumptions.

Bridge into the IPS map

The general map therefore preserves causal ancestry after an IPS disappears. “Remove the actor” is not modeled as “undo the actor.” In a future nonlinear version, theorem-like retained-influence coefficients would have to be estimated rather than assumed.

Under the no-control premise, the theorem's direct strategy of choosing the newcomer's restoring priority cannot be assumed available. A research question is whether coupling, interface, retention, or compensating outputs can provide an analogous restoration mechanism while leaving the autonomous IPS free.

Selected IPS / edge

Click or drag a node. Click an edge to inspect its channel, delay, strength, and feedback status.

IPS boundary rule

An IPS is a declared analytical boundary with state, inputs, transformation dynamics, and outputs. Humans, AI agents, institutions, markets, ecosystems, and the world-scale envelope may all be modeled this way without implying consciousness.

Prospective lens refinement

Current committed lens: v1

projection horizon3

Purpose sensitivity1.00

Flow sensitivity1.00

Kindness sensitivity1.00

Integrity sensitivity1.00

Evolution sensitivity1.00

unresolved threshold0.58

response mode

revision note

Integrity rule: committing a new lens affects only future events. Historical output verdicts stay frozen under the lens version that evaluated them.

Lens history

Mycelium channels

continuous flow particles IPS membership links leaf node labels feedback edges dashed

Macro-IPS filters

Interaction

wheel zoom

drag background pan

drag node reposition IPS

click node/edge inspect

click history replay audit state

Source register

This update uses the prior 2026-09-09 alignment review and the merged IPS/reflexive/VowOS artifacts. The complete source list used to shape the current architecture is reproduced below.