# Independent human review requested - v1.0

Primary gap: no independent human mathematical review of this current work has been established. This brief asks for criticism, not endorsement.

Scope: Theorem4.1 and Corollary4.2 in Priority_State_Dynamics_v07_Full.pdf (SHA256 c3171ce35ca77b61cdacf5beb8f8288f7335472682ad0a6cdab071d553622bc8), PDF pages9-14 / printed pages3-8. Check the source directly before reading the AI commentary if an unprimed assessment is feasible.

Please examine: dimensions and row/objective labels; strict positivity and deletion denominators; independence from q when T is fixed; normalization and admissibility of q*; zero-influence b=0 case; equal-retention/double-stochastic specialization; weighted versus unweighted neighbour interpretation; the subsequent fixed-epoch assumptions behind endpoint terminology; and whether the proposed generality or limitations are misstated.

Distinguish algebraic correctness, novelty, implementation equivalence, physical applicability and proposed human/LLM analogies. The current claim does not establish the latter three. Report a narrower surviving result if a broader statement fails. Evidence of error is welcome; source-linked disagreement is not disloyalty.

The AI reconstruction and exact rational checks are supporting materials, not independent human acceptance. There is no requested predetermined verdict. No outreach or reviewer appointment has occurred merely by preparing this brief.